Barbarian Brits

As much as the Judeao-Christian and Graeco-Roman elites wish to take credit for seeding the world and giving us western civilization, it was the descendants of the ancient Barbarian Brits who brought us out of Dark Age religious slavery and their DNA, at that time, was almost 100% recognizable from that of their Judaeo-Christian, Graeco-Roman masters.

Because the pre-Roman inhabitants of Britain had no written language, wore trousers, were loud and ferocious, drank to excess and painted their gigantic bodies in blue wode which, with their white faces and red hair probably made them look as bad as they smelled, they were considered barbarians.

The history, culture and way of life of the ancient Britons are known only through recent archaeological finds and these -- along with recent DNA studies -- repudiate completely long-held beliefs put forward by those in the past with a vested interest in maintaining their supposed ethnic or religious superiority over other cultures.

Ancient texts ascribing the origin of the Britons to mythical figures such as the biblical Noah from Syria or Aneus from Troy are very romantic, but they served only the enslaving Judaeo-Christian or Graeco-Roman elites which ruled the world at the time and have no basis whatsoever in truth.

Let's face it, Abraham's legacy in all of his religions is one of enslavement, and every scientific advance made since we came out of the Dark Ages has freed us, one chain at a time, from the ignorance and religious superstition the elites have used for thousands of years to keep us enslaved.

If Noak's flood subsided 833 years before the foundation of Troy and 2317 years before the birth of Christ, then who was responsible for building the Castlerigg Stone Circle in Cumbria, the chambered tomb at Pentre Ifan in Dyfed and the passage grave at Bryn Celli Ddu in Anglesey -- all of which are archaeologically dated c.3000-2500 BCE. Undoubtedly, a sophisticated culture existed in Britain long before Noah or Troy existed and one day science may prove that all of the ancient civilizations were actually founded by migrating Europeans, possibly Brits!

Moreover, recent analysis of the mitochondrial DNA of modern European populations has changed forever the belief that ancient Britons -- or any other ancient European tribe -- being ethnically diverse.Rather than being annihilated by successive invasions and mass immigration waves --particularly during the Roman occupation which brought Middle Eastern, African and Asian DNA into the mix --the ancient Britons still exist in modern European populations which are over 80% descended in the female line from the same European stock.

And, the same is true for the male Y-Chromosome in European populations because even President Thomas Jefferson, from British stock,was found to be in the rare haplogroup K2, only one K being found among 1772 British men tested. Therefore,the vast majority of the Britons are most definitely not descended from the Judaeo-Christian people of the Levant, and are unlikely to have much Graeco-Roman DNA in them either because the ancient Greeks and Romans were originally descended from the ancient ancestors of the Judaeo-Christian people of the Levant and North African areas.

So, when we talk about ancient Britons as distinct from ancient Goths or Gauls, we are really talking about Europeans who happened to develop differently because they lived on an island which had become separated from Europe about 8,500 years ago following the end of the ice age when the rising sea levels caused by the melting glaciers flooded the land bridge that had previously allowed free movement of people from one part of Europe to another.

Cut off from their continental kinsmen -- until boats brought them back together -- the ancient Britons had to survive on what land and resources they had. From hunter-gatherers, roaming across Europe, moving to the warmer south for the winter and the cooler north for the summer, they were forced to stay in one particular area.

Animals, too, had to adapt to an island environment, but did not fare as well as the ancient Britons. The larger of the animals were hunted out of existence, leaving only smaller animals such as elk, deer, boar as the staple diet. Different hunting techniques had to be developed, different tools had to be used to catch smaller animals, and by around 4,500 BC farming of both crops and domestic animals had developed to provide reliable food sources fora population increase that had caused the Britons to spread and reach the far north of Scotland.

So, because of their island isolation, the ancient Britons necessarily had to develop differently from their continental kinsmen, and the first trait to go was a nomadic hunter-gathering existence.They became permanent occupiers of land and developed food management skills, farming and husbandry, far in advance of other tribes around the world.

Also, in an oral culure rich in ballads and bards, a craft culture rich in beautiful designs and a religious culture rich in mystery and magic as well as diabolical deeds --- the development of writing was obviously deemed superfluous.

By the time the land bridge had been replaced by boat links, allowing the easy flow of people, trade, ideas and technologies to and from the continent, land ownership had developed a special significance for the British. They were fiercely territorial, and with this came constant warfare between the British tribes, requiring kings to lead them -- and understandably all Britons had a healthy suspicion of newcomers (and still do) -- but this lack of cohesion ultimately led to their slavery under the Romans and the foreign priests who followed them.

Wave after wave of foreign immigrants, preachers and armies have arrived on Britain's shores over the centuries, but if 80% of Britons are descended in the female line from the same European Eve --and if only one in 1,772 British men (like Thomas Jefferson) descended from an African or Middle Eastern Adam --then the Brits today are a lot more homogeneous than they think they are.

slavery and civilization

All civilizations, including modern Western civilization, were based upon slave labor, and there is plenty of evidence to support the view that without slavery of one sort or another no great civilization could have existed - or can continue to exist.

While many factors determine the fall of civilizations, it is interesting to note that the British Empire - the bastion of Western civilization - crumbled in 1947 just over a hundred years after abolishing slavery in all British dominions in 1807 and in all British colonies in 1833.

Slavery, of course, persisted in the USA until the Civil War of 1865, but there are those who claim that it persists in the guise of slave wages and illegal immigrant workers - the existence of both type of 'slaves' being responsible for its present global power.

The Russian civilization - dating back to 950 AD - overthrew slavery and monarchy in the revolution of 1917, but it, too, crumbled in 1989 as a result of the grinding poverty and wage slavery imposed upon the proletariats by their so-called egalitarian masters.

The Chinese civilization - dating back to 589 AD and related to the former Sinic civilization - overthrew in 1853 the hated Manchu rulers who forced all adult males to shave their heads or lose them, and then it went through a hundred years of internal strife and foreign invasion before the communists took over in 1949 and instituted a social system similar to that of Russia's which turned out to have a similar result.

The Japanese civilization - dating back to 645 AD and also related to the former Sinic civilization - relied heavily on immigrant 'slave' labor until it was forced to reinvent itself after its humiliating defeat in World War II.

The Hindu civilization - dating back to 810 AD - continues to be based on a rigid caste system which, in effect, is slavery of a lower caste by a higher caste but nobody openly admits it. As such, Indian civilization - based upon the premise that no civilization can exist without slave labor - is likely to continue forever!

The only existing civilization that continues with blatant slavery - sanctioned or not - is the Islamic civilization dating back to 1320 AD.

In that many workers in western style countries earn barely enough to sustain themselves, it can be argued that they are not much better off than the slaves of yesteryear and probably worse off because many slave-holders treated their slaves kindly, sometimes as part of the family. In fact, modern employers gain a lot more profit out of their 'wage slaves' than they did out of those they once shackled, so the whole notion of 'freedom' is spurious.

As the world at the start of the 21st century heads towards a clash of civilizations - namely the Islamic civilization and what remains of Western civilization - it is likely that unless the populations of western countries become more willing 'slaves' of the ruling classes, working for less reward and offering up their lives in the same manner that Islamic populations do, the freedoms afforded by Western civilization will be its ultimate downfall.

why did civilization take ages to develop?

A leisured class - one capable of developing the trappings of civilization - can only develop when basic needs of shelter, sustenance and protection are met by a large working class (usually slaves). Also, no great civilization can develop without a locus, a strategic place to settle with fertile soil, a good water supply and a pleasant climate.

When the Mediterranean seafarers landed in Egypt thousands of years ago, they found all that they needed plus an abundance of docile African nomadic hunters and gatherers who were easy to enslave.

Civilization was unable to develop early in Europe because the Ice Age isolated the tribes and when they did meet they were incredibly hostile to each other. When all of your time is spent providing for shelter, sustenance and protection for yourself and family, there is no time left to do anything else.

Migrating south, to a warmer climate, was possible at the end of the Ice Age, and whereas our very first ancestors trekked north by foot - following the animals they hunted - our later ancestors used boats to migrate south via the Mediterranean and lived off fish.

Egypt was the garden of Eden for the early settlers from Europe. No wonder they didn't want to leave! Agriculture developed quickly through the use of slaves, as did the building of solid structures.

Trade in slaves and excess food enriched the developing Egyptiac civilization to such an extent that the leisured class, the masters, were able to establish incredibly wealthy dynasties around which a middle class of artisans and courtiers quickly developed.

The pattern set by the early settlers in Egypt was to be followed century after century by new waves of colonizers in other lands who either enslaved the indigenous populations or took their own slaves with them.