Barbarian Brits

As much as the Judeao-Christian and Graeco-Roman elites wish to take credit for seeding the world and giving us western civilization, it was the descendants of the ancient Barbarian Brits who brought us out of Dark Age religious slavery and their DNA, at that time, was almost 100% recognizable from that of their Judaeo-Christian, Graeco-Roman masters.

Because the pre-Roman inhabitants of Britain had no written language, wore trousers, were loud and ferocious, drank to excess and painted their gigantic bodies in blue wode which, with their white faces and red hair probably made them look as bad as they smelled, they were considered barbarians.

The history, culture and way of life of the ancient Britons are known only through recent archaeological finds and these -- along with recent DNA studies -- repudiate completely long-held beliefs put forward by those in the past with a vested interest in maintaining their supposed ethnic or religious superiority over other cultures.

Ancient texts ascribing the origin of the Britons to mythical figures such as the biblical Noah from Syria or Aneus from Troy are very romantic, but they served only the enslaving Judaeo-Christian or Graeco-Roman elites which ruled the world at the time and have no basis whatsoever in truth.

Let's face it, Abraham's legacy in all of his religions is one of enslavement, and every scientific advance made since we came out of the Dark Ages has freed us, one chain at a time, from the ignorance and religious superstition the elites have used for thousands of years to keep us enslaved.

If Noak's flood subsided 833 years before the foundation of Troy and 2317 years before the birth of Christ, then who was responsible for building the Castlerigg Stone Circle in Cumbria, the chambered tomb at Pentre Ifan in Dyfed and the passage grave at Bryn Celli Ddu in Anglesey -- all of which are archaeologically dated c.3000-2500 BCE. Undoubtedly, a sophisticated culture existed in Britain long before Noah or Troy existed and one day science may prove that all of the ancient civilizations were actually founded by migrating Europeans, possibly Brits!

Moreover, recent analysis of the mitochondrial DNA of modern European populations has changed forever the belief that ancient Britons -- or any other ancient European tribe -- being ethnically diverse.Rather than being annihilated by successive invasions and mass immigration waves --particularly during the Roman occupation which brought Middle Eastern, African and Asian DNA into the mix --the ancient Britons still exist in modern European populations which are over 80% descended in the female line from the same European stock.

And, the same is true for the male Y-Chromosome in European populations because even President Thomas Jefferson, from British stock,was found to be in the rare haplogroup K2, only one K being found among 1772 British men tested. Therefore,the vast majority of the Britons are most definitely not descended from the Judaeo-Christian people of the Levant, and are unlikely to have much Graeco-Roman DNA in them either because the ancient Greeks and Romans were originally descended from the ancient ancestors of the Judaeo-Christian people of the Levant and North African areas.

So, when we talk about ancient Britons as distinct from ancient Goths or Gauls, we are really talking about Europeans who happened to develop differently because they lived on an island which had become separated from Europe about 8,500 years ago following the end of the ice age when the rising sea levels caused by the melting glaciers flooded the land bridge that had previously allowed free movement of people from one part of Europe to another.

Cut off from their continental kinsmen -- until boats brought them back together -- the ancient Britons had to survive on what land and resources they had. From hunter-gatherers, roaming across Europe, moving to the warmer south for the winter and the cooler north for the summer, they were forced to stay in one particular area.

Animals, too, had to adapt to an island environment, but did not fare as well as the ancient Britons. The larger of the animals were hunted out of existence, leaving only smaller animals such as elk, deer, boar as the staple diet. Different hunting techniques had to be developed, different tools had to be used to catch smaller animals, and by around 4,500 BC farming of both crops and domestic animals had developed to provide reliable food sources fora population increase that had caused the Britons to spread and reach the far north of Scotland.

So, because of their island isolation, the ancient Britons necessarily had to develop differently from their continental kinsmen, and the first trait to go was a nomadic hunter-gathering existence.They became permanent occupiers of land and developed food management skills, farming and husbandry, far in advance of other tribes around the world.

Also, in an oral culure rich in ballads and bards, a craft culture rich in beautiful designs and a religious culture rich in mystery and magic as well as diabolical deeds --- the development of writing was obviously deemed superfluous.

By the time the land bridge had been replaced by boat links, allowing the easy flow of people, trade, ideas and technologies to and from the continent, land ownership had developed a special significance for the British. They were fiercely territorial, and with this came constant warfare between the British tribes, requiring kings to lead them -- and understandably all Britons had a healthy suspicion of newcomers (and still do) -- but this lack of cohesion ultimately led to their slavery under the Romans and the foreign priests who followed them.

Wave after wave of foreign immigrants, preachers and armies have arrived on Britain's shores over the centuries, but if 80% of Britons are descended in the female line from the same European Eve --and if only one in 1,772 British men (like Thomas Jefferson) descended from an African or Middle Eastern Adam --then the Brits today are a lot more homogeneous than they think they are.